posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23020 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18474 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19280 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19610 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19280 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20158 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20359 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20232 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20597 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20564 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20637 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21164 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20983 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21426 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21070 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21362 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21332 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21361 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21214 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20965 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21148 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21046 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21214 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21361 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21332 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21362 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21070 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21426 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20983 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21164 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20637 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20564 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20597 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21000 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20424 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19800 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19351 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18780 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19351 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19800 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20424 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20232 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18474 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.