posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27771 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22207 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23115 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23463 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23115 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24064 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24249 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24106 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24673 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24342 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24533 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25303 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24774 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25465 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24893 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25418 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25212 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25412 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25027 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24961 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25178 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24783 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25027 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25412 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25212 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25418 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24893 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25465 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24774 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25303 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24533 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24342 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24673 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25127 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24263 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23848 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23203 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22781 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23203 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23848 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24263 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24106 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22207 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


