posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30026 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23874 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24794 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25145 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24794 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25729 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25930 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25863 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26441 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26103 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26282 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27109 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26535 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27248 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26689 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27172 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27026 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27143 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26756 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26799 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26903 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26437 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26756 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27143 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27026 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27172 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26689 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27248 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26535 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27109 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26282 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26103 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26441 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26837 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25954 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25531 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24881 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24463 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24881 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25531 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25954 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25863 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23874 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


