home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 172792

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae

Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.

a few of which appear to be vibers

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20478 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16440 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17226 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17549 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18023 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18185 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18129 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18333 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18414 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18431 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18826 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18806 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19041 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18845 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18956 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19104 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18977 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19019 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18818 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18740 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18811 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18679 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18248 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17560 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17309 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16636 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.