posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27779 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22213 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23117 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23471 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23117 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24069 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24257 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24113 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24685 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24350 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24540 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25313 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24781 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25477 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24903 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25427 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25222 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25424 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25033 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24975 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25189 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24789 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25033 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25424 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25222 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25427 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24903 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25477 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24781 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25313 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24540 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24350 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24685 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25141 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24269 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23851 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23206 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22791 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23206 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23851 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24269 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24113 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22213 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


