posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12998 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11038 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11409 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11833 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11409 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12126 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12347 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12463 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12433 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12635 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12690 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12844 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12994 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13076 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13124 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13111 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13172 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13023 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13174 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12977 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12902 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12855 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13174 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13023 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13172 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13111 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13124 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13076 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12994 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12844 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12690 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12635 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12433 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12737 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12497 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12009 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11778 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11215 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11778 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12009 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12497 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12463 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11038 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.