home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 173361

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae

Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.

a few of which appear to be vibers

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21842 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17627 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18403 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18703 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19209 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19425 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19326 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19519 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19627 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19673 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20069 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20039 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20322 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20117 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20237 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20370 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20261 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20249 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20028 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20043 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20079 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19884 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19492 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18716 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18422 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17733 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.