posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28552 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22739 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23646 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24017 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23646 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24605 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24793 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24646 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25228 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24917 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25118 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25892 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25337 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26042 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25466 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25992 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25823 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25962 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25563 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25558 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25734 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25325 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25563 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25962 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25823 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25992 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25466 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26042 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25337 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25892 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25118 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24917 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25228 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25671 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24791 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24386 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23747 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23326 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23747 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24386 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24791 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24646 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22739 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


