posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23810 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19228 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20049 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20350 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20049 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20867 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21079 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20972 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21352 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21276 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21365 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21920 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21684 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22164 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21777 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22125 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22041 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22102 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21929 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21667 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21900 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21734 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21929 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22102 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22041 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22125 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21777 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22164 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21684 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21920 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21365 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21276 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21352 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21734 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21149 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20566 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20068 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19510 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20068 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20566 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21149 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20972 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19228 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


