posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22843 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18316 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19134 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19438 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19134 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19990 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20196 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20066 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20397 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20392 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20475 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20969 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20800 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21215 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20885 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21153 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21154 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21156 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21042 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20779 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20946 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20866 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21042 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21156 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21154 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21153 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20885 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21215 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20800 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20969 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20475 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20392 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20397 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20783 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20258 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19596 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19186 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18576 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19186 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19596 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20258 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20066 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18316 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.