posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29822 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23703 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24625 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24989 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24625 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25582 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25790 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25707 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26292 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25945 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26113 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26942 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26378 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27072 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26513 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27007 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26862 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26994 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26595 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26657 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26744 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26288 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26595 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26994 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26862 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27007 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26513 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27072 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26378 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26942 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26113 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25945 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26292 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26679 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25804 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25382 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24733 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24297 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24733 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25382 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25804 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25707 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23703 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


