posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28556 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22742 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23647 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24024 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23647 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24607 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24795 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24647 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25230 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24918 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25119 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25892 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25340 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26046 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25473 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25997 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25828 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25968 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25571 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25567 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25737 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25330 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25571 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25968 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25828 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25997 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25473 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26046 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25340 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25892 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25119 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24918 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25230 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25675 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24795 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24391 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23751 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23329 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23751 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24391 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24795 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24647 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22742 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


