posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22649 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18190 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18982 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19307 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18982 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19836 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20038 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19915 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20226 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20242 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20306 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20783 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20663 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21026 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20750 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20981 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21010 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20982 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20908 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20661 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20784 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20720 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20908 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20982 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21010 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20981 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20750 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21026 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20663 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20783 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20306 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20242 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20226 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20602 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20126 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19417 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19025 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18394 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19025 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19417 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20126 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19915 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18190 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.