posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27786 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22214 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23122 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23472 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23122 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24073 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24265 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24116 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24694 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24353 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24542 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25318 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24786 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25492 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24907 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25438 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25226 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25441 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25038 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24986 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25200 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24795 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25038 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25441 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25226 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25438 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24907 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25492 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24786 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25318 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24542 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24353 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24694 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25155 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24281 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23861 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23211 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22796 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23211 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23861 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24281 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24116 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22214 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


