posted on 18/11/2020 13:19I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae
Its only the apologists that seem unclear on this now.
a few of which appear to be vibers
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26051 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20772 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21625 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21932 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21625 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22478 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22704 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22549 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23119 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22808 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22962 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23685 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23216 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23883 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23319 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23856 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23602 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23836 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23464 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23303 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23630 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23266 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23464 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23836 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23602 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23856 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23319 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23883 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23216 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23685 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22962 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22808 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23119 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23561 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22725 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22320 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21671 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21298 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21671 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22320 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22725 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22549 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20772 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


