posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20452 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16419 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17196 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17516 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17196 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 17990 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18154 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18097 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18294 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18380 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18397 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18797 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18771 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19007 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18811 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18927 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19070 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18942 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18984 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18790 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18709 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18781 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18984 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18942 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19070 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18927 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18811 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19007 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18771 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18797 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18397 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18380 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18294 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18645 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18213 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17530 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17292 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16609 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17292 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17530 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18213 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18097 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16419 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.