posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13026 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11079 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11442 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11864 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11442 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12147 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12371 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12505 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12478 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12681 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12725 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12885 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13032 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13112 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13151 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13156 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13209 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13068 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13210 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13013 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12948 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12886 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13210 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13068 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13209 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13156 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13151 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13112 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13032 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12885 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12725 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12681 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12478 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12774 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12538 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12048 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11804 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11246 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11804 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12048 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12538 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12505 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11079 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.