posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20990 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16922 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17699 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18049 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17699 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18523 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18712 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18626 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18855 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18937 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18977 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19372 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19352 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19608 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19402 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19527 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19687 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19541 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19566 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19354 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19305 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19362 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19566 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19541 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19687 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19527 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19402 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19608 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19352 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19372 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18977 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18937 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18855 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19204 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18823 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18056 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17801 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17101 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17801 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18056 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18823 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18626 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16922 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.