posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20454 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16427 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17203 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17523 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17203 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18000 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18164 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18107 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18303 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18392 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18411 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18809 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18788 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19022 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18826 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18941 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19081 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18956 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18999 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18803 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18727 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18799 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18999 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18956 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19081 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18941 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18826 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19022 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18788 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18809 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18411 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18392 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18303 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18662 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18230 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17543 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17301 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16621 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17301 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17543 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18230 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18107 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16427 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.