posted on 19/11/2020 00:50Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
She is in a powerful position now as Starmer is terrified that she will leave the party. She is probably in her last term as a MP anyway, so isn't worried about re-election... but just whether it's Starmer or Johnson that will reward her with a peerage. Expect her to resign when Jeremy regains his place in the PLP.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20760 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16748 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17513 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17874 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17513 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18342 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18521 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18429 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18658 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18736 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18761 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19169 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19148 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19393 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19199 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19304 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19448 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19323 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19347 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19166 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19108 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19157 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19347 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19323 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19448 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19304 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19199 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19393 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19148 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19169 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18761 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18736 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18658 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18994 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18626 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17855 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17610 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16927 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17610 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17855 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18626 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18429 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16748 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.