posted on 19/11/2020 00:50Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
She is in a powerful position now as Starmer is terrified that she will leave the party. She is probably in her last term as a MP anyway, so isn't worried about re-election... but just whether it's Starmer or Johnson that will reward her with a peerage. Expect her to resign when Jeremy regains his place in the PLP.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20476 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16440 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17224 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17546 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17224 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18020 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18184 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18128 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18329 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18413 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18430 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18824 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18802 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19037 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18842 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18954 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19102 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18974 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19017 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18816 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18738 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18809 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19017 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18974 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19102 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18954 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18842 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19037 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18802 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18824 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18430 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18413 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18329 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18677 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18244 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17558 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17309 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16634 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17309 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17558 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18244 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18128 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16440 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.