2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26046 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20756 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21612 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21922 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22470 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22696 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22534 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23107 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22798 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22951 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23669 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23208 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23873 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23314 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23843 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23590 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23822 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23456 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23292 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23618 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23259 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23545 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22722 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22308 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21659 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21287 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply