2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26354 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21052 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21912 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22233 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22791 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23017 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22848 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23449 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23107 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23267 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24020 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23525 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24195 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23637 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24180 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23919 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24148 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23778 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23637 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23949 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23591 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23880 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23042 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22641 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21989 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21623 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply