2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28549 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22738 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23642 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24015 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24605 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24793 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24646 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25228 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24917 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25117 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25889 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25334 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26039 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25462 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25990 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25821 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25961 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25563 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25557 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25733 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25320 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25669 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24790 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24384 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23747 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23326 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply