posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21734 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17556 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18327 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18630 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18327 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19129 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19355 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19234 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19440 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19552 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19597 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19974 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19959 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20236 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20035 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20149 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20281 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20187 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20172 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19956 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19963 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20017 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20172 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20187 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20281 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20149 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20035 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20236 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19959 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19974 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19597 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19552 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19440 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19801 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19423 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18648 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18359 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17668 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18359 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18648 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19423 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19234 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17556 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.