posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12989 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11032 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11403 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11821 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11403 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12120 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12342 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12456 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12426 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12627 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12683 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12831 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12988 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13062 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13114 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13106 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13164 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13018 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13172 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12971 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12897 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12849 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13172 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13018 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13164 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13106 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13114 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13062 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12988 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12831 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12683 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12627 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12426 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12729 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12494 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12003 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11773 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11205 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11773 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12003 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12494 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12456 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11032 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.