home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8797

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21205 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17118 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17888 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18262 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18725 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18914 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18838 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19053 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19156 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19191 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19590 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19580 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19829 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19622 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19729 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19881 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19770 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19777 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19573 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19509 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19593 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19422 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19004 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18227 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17971 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17279 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.