home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8797

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 10:11do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci.

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20683 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16671 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17436 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17799 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18267 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18453 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18359 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18579 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18665 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18690 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19090 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19074 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19319 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19117 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19226 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19381 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19243 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19273 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19085 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19040 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19091 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18931 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18563 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17786 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17536 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16858 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.