posted on 19/11/2020 10:30go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae
I can only imagine what and where it goes
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26049 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20767 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21624 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21930 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21624 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22475 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22703 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22548 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23116 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22806 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22959 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23679 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23213 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23880 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23314 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23850 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23595 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23829 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23462 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23298 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23625 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23262 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23462 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23829 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23595 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23850 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23314 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23880 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23213 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23679 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22959 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22806 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23116 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23557 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22723 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22314 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21667 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21295 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21667 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22314 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22723 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22548 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20767 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


