posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29584 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23480 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24396 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24743 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24396 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25341 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25548 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25451 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26051 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25697 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25868 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26699 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26116 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26817 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26270 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26762 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26612 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26742 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26350 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26389 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26494 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26048 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26350 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26742 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26612 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26762 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26270 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26817 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26116 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26699 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25868 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25697 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26051 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26446 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25575 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25164 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24526 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24086 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24526 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25164 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25575 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25451 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23480 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

