posted on 19/11/2020 10:35Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci.
"In 1987 the West London Synagogue approached Islington Council with a startling proposal: to sell its original cemetery to property developers, destroying the gravestones and digging-up and reburying the bodies lying under them. This cemetery 7(dating from 1840) was not merely of great historic and architectural interest – in the view of orthodox Jews, the deliberate destruction of a cemetery is sacrilegious.
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
"7So when Islington Council granted the planning application, a Jewish-led and ultimately successful campaign was launched to have the decision reversed.
"I was part of that campaign. So was Jeremy Corbyn.
"Meanwhile, the then-leader of Islington Council (1982-92)7, whose decision to permit the destruction of the cemetery was eventually overturned, was none other than
"Margaret Hodge"
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20691 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16681 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17442 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17807 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17442 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18273 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18454 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18362 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18582 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18670 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18698 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19091 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19078 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19325 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19121 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19229 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19384 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19246 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19275 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19094 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19043 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19094 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19275 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19246 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19384 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19229 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19121 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19325 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19078 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19091 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18698 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18670 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18582 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18933 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18567 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17789 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17541 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16858 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17541 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17789 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18567 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18362 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16681 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.