2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"

We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"

Plus ca change

- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31740 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25500 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26407 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26841 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27394 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27631 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27588 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 28246 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27889 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 28089 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28939 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 28237 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28965 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28418 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28910 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28817 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28922 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28514 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28649 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28663 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 28111 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28601 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27692 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 27230 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26517 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 26134 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply