posted on 19/11/2020 12:14Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circ*mstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae
"Having to resort to 'legal defiitions' to excuse their (possible) behaviour or speech ....etc"
We both know where this whole 'thing' is going, we saw it with Kinnock in the 80s , we saw it with Blair in the 90s / 00s and we're seeing it again now with Starmer in the 20s. As Arty so very well put it yesterday "I'm worried we (Labour) will remain in a civil war"
Plus ca change
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13172 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11172 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11530 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11942 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11530 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12233 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12461 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12594 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12586 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12781 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12829 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12997 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13132 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13219 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13259 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13277 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13318 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13178 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13322 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13128 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13068 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12993 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13322 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13178 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13318 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13277 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13259 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13219 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13132 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12997 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12829 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12781 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12586 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12892 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12628 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12157 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11898 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11360 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11898 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12157 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12628 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12594 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11172 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.