posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29572 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23462 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24380 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24722 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24380 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25320 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25528 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25431 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26035 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25683 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25855 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26684 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26107 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26805 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26257 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26755 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26602 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26734 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26341 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26377 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26484 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26036 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26341 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26734 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26602 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26755 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26257 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26805 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26107 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26684 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25855 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25683 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26035 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26434 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25563 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25152 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24508 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24070 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24508 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25152 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25563 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25431 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23462 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

