posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27774 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22212 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23116 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23470 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23116 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24069 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24254 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24113 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24682 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24349 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24540 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25311 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24778 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25471 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24900 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25422 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25220 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25419 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25033 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24971 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25183 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24786 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25033 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25419 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25220 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25422 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24900 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25471 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24778 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25311 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24540 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24349 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24682 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25131 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24268 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23849 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23205 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22790 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23205 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23849 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24268 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24113 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22212 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

