Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26789 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21401 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22266 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22615 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22266 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23193 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23425 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23241 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23848 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23506 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23695 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24453 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23987 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24649 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24084 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24597 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24353 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24594 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24199 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24066 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24364 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24000 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24199 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24594 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24353 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24597 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24084 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24649 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23987 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24453 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23695 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23506 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23848 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24287 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23449 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23048 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22395 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21992 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22395 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23048 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23449 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23241 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21401 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.