Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21463 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17289 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18115 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18425 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18115 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18921 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19134 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19008 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19212 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19317 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19362 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19740 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19716 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19980 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19770 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19895 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20033 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19937 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19945 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19735 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19676 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19788 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19945 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19937 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20033 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19895 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19770 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19980 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19716 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19740 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19362 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19317 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19212 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19588 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19171 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18419 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18144 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17444 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18144 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18419 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19171 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19008 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17289 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.