Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22008 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17717 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18504 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18796 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18504 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19334 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19558 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19414 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19615 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19737 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19793 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20179 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20145 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20430 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20227 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20347 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20488 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20372 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20363 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20127 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20156 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20213 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20363 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20372 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20488 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20347 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20227 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20430 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20145 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20179 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19793 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19737 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19615 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19999 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19612 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18815 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18542 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17844 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18542 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18815 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19612 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19414 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17717 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.