Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26516 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21224 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22094 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22418 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22094 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23003 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23220 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23049 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23660 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23311 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23490 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24249 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23772 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24443 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23850 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24394 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24142 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24420 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23996 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23866 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24184 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23789 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23996 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24420 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24142 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24394 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23850 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24443 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23772 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24249 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23490 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23311 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23660 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24086 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23236 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22851 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22188 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21810 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22188 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22851 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23236 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23049 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21224 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.