Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23721 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19143 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19956 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20256 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19956 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20798 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21019 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20889 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21286 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21201 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21286 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21833 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21614 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22088 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21705 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22038 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21959 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22033 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21844 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21593 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21836 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21669 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21844 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22033 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21959 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22038 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21705 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22088 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21614 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21833 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21286 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21201 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21286 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21665 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21082 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20491 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20006 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19443 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20006 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20491 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21082 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20889 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19143 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.