Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21741 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17560 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18329 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18634 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18329 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19134 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19359 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19236 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19442 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19555 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19603 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19975 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19964 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20238 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20039 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20150 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20285 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20188 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20180 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19959 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19965 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20020 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20180 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20188 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20285 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20150 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20039 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20238 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19964 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19975 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19603 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19555 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19442 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19806 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19424 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18655 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18360 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17671 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18360 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18655 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19424 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19236 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17560 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.