Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23815 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19236 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20050 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20353 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20050 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20871 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21084 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20980 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21359 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21283 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21368 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21931 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21694 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22173 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21782 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22136 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22044 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22105 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21939 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21678 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21903 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21745 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21939 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22105 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22044 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22136 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21782 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22173 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21694 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21931 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21368 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21283 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21359 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21741 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21156 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20574 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20071 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19518 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20071 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20574 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21156 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20980 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19236 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.