Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23264 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18727 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19547 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19853 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19547 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20412 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20616 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20485 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20875 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20822 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20909 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21435 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21230 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21679 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21312 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21633 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21584 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21626 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21457 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21193 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21408 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21278 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21457 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21626 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21584 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21633 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21312 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21679 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21230 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21435 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20909 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20822 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20875 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21246 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20681 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20063 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19602 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19055 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19602 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20063 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20681 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20485 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18727 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.