Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21655 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17501 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18271 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18589 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18271 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19089 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19315 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19182 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19384 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19500 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19539 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19906 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19890 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20165 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19959 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20082 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20224 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20111 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20114 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19903 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19901 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19968 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20114 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20111 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20224 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20082 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19959 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20165 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19890 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19906 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19539 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19500 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19384 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19753 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19377 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18598 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18318 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17617 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18318 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18598 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19377 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19182 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17501 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.