Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28234 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22543 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23449 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23822 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23449 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24407 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24602 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24463 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25032 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24722 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24916 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25681 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25140 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25836 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25272 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25789 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25610 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25774 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25385 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25354 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25537 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25135 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25385 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25774 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25610 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25789 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25272 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25836 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25140 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25681 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24916 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24722 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25032 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25478 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24607 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24193 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23561 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23124 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23561 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24193 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24607 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24463 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22543 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.