posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31452 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25160 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26080 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26508 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26080 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27058 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27317 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27253 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27903 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27555 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27731 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28579 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27897 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28628 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28089 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28579 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28474 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28578 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28159 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28287 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28312 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27798 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28159 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28578 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28474 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28579 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28089 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28628 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27897 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28579 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27731 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27555 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27903 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28269 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27376 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26917 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26217 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25791 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26217 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26917 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27376 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27253 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25160 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

