home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 12799

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin

And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20685 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16673 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17438 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17801 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18268 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18453 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18360 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18579 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18666 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18691 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19091 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19075 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19322 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19119 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19227 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19383 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19244 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19275 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19087 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19040 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19093 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18931 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18564 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17786 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17539 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16858 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.