posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29574 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23467 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24382 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24729 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24382 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25327 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25534 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25437 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26039 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25684 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25858 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26693 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26113 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26811 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26264 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26759 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26607 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26740 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26344 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26381 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26490 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26042 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26344 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26740 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26607 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26759 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26264 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26811 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26113 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26693 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25858 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25684 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26039 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26439 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25569 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25156 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24512 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24077 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24512 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25156 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25569 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25437 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23467 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

