posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26346 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21048 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21907 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22225 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21907 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22784 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23013 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22841 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23443 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23100 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23259 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24010 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23521 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24191 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23632 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24170 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23915 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24141 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23770 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23633 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23946 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23582 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23770 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24141 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23915 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24170 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23632 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24191 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23521 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24010 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23259 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23100 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23443 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23875 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23035 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22635 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21981 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21613 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21981 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22635 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23035 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22841 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21048 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

