home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 12802

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin

And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22843 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18318 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19134 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19439 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19992 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20201 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20067 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20397 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20395 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20478 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20970 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20800 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21215 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20885 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21153 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21154 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21156 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21044 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20782 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20946 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20867 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20783 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20261 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19596 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19187 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18577 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.