posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23813 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19235 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20050 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20352 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20050 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20868 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21083 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20976 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21356 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21279 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21367 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21929 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21690 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22170 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21780 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22130 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22041 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22104 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21934 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21669 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21901 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21740 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21934 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22104 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22041 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22130 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21780 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22170 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21690 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21929 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21367 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21279 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21356 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21738 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21151 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20571 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20069 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19513 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20069 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20571 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21151 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20976 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19235 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

