posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25861 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20617 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21476 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21770 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21476 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22275 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22504 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22396 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22971 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22672 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22829 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23557 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23086 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23753 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23193 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23738 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23461 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23694 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23318 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23135 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23489 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23133 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23318 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23694 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23461 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23738 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23193 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23753 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23086 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23557 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22829 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22672 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22971 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23390 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22594 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22183 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21515 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21138 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21515 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22183 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22594 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22396 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20617 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

