posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13007 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11058 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11424 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11846 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11424 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12136 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12355 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12486 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12459 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12661 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12710 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12863 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13007 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13096 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13140 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13133 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13191 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13045 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13188 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12995 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12920 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12871 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13188 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13045 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13191 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13133 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13140 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13096 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13007 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12863 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12710 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12661 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12459 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12753 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12513 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12026 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11786 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11232 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11786 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12026 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12513 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12486 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11058 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.