posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13173 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11173 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11531 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11944 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11531 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12235 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12464 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12596 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12590 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12786 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12834 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 13003 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13138 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13223 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13268 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13282 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13325 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13180 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13328 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13132 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 13070 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12998 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13328 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13180 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13325 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13282 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13268 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13223 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13138 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 13003 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12834 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12786 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12590 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12894 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12629 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12159 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11899 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11360 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11899 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12159 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12629 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12596 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11173 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.