posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28558 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22745 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23648 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24028 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23648 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24608 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24796 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24649 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25233 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24920 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25120 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25893 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25344 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26048 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25474 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26002 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25829 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25969 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25572 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25569 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25742 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25336 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25572 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25969 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25829 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26002 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25474 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26048 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25344 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25893 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25120 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24920 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25233 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25680 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24800 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24395 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23755 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23332 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23755 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24395 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24800 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24649 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22745 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

