posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26135 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20814 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21665 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21976 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21665 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22543 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22778 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22591 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23190 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22858 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23014 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23762 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23279 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23947 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23376 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23930 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23668 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23891 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23524 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23372 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23702 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23336 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23524 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23891 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23668 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23930 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23376 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23947 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23279 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23762 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23014 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22858 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23190 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23626 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22800 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22392 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21745 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21375 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21745 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22392 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22800 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22591 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20814 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

