posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25115 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20137 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20958 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21266 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20958 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21780 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22005 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21874 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22438 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22161 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22288 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23020 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22575 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23245 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22656 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23207 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22932 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23190 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22832 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22616 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23023 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22675 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22832 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23190 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22932 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23207 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22656 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23245 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22575 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23020 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22288 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22161 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22438 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22858 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22086 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21654 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21002 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20623 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21002 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21654 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22086 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21874 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20137 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

