posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30647 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24443 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25351 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25779 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25351 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 26329 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 26560 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26442 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27063 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26725 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26893 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27697 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27113 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27801 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27255 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27724 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27625 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27712 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27329 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 27427 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 27485 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27029 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27329 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27712 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27625 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27724 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27255 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27801 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27113 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27697 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26893 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26725 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27063 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 27448 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26564 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26110 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25463 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25039 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25463 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26110 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26564 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26442 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24443 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

