posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29566 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23446 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24368 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24711 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24368 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25306 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25514 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25412 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26021 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25666 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25833 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26669 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26084 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26789 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26240 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26737 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26585 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26714 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26317 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26356 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26465 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26018 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26317 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26714 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26585 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26737 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26240 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26789 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26084 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26669 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25833 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25666 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26021 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26416 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25543 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25127 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24484 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24045 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24484 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25127 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25543 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25412 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23446 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


